Terug naar Encyclopedie

Unfair Terms in Rental Agreements in Tilburg: Recognition and Consequences

Unfair terms in Tilburg rental agreements are void and disadvantage tenants. Recognise them, such as excessive repair obligations in Reeshof flats, and have them struck out by the district court judge. (28 words)

2 min leestijd

In Tilburg, unfair terms in rental agreements are void under Book 6 of the Dutch Civil Code (BW). These clauses disproportionately disadvantage tenants, such as a ban on pets in student rooms around Tilburg University without reasonable grounds, or automatic rent indexation exceeding the statutory limit in neighbourhoods such as the Reeshof or Het Zand. Article 6:236 BW lists general unfair terms, while Article 6:248 BW sets specific rules for rental agreements. Tenants in Tilburg may disregard these provisions and request the district court judge in the East Brabant District Court to declare them void. Landlords, often active in the growing rental market due to the university and companies such as ASML in the region, may not abuse their dominant position. Example: a clause obliging the tenant to carry out all repairs, including minor defects to bicycle sheds or window frames in older Tilburg flats, is void because the law holds the landlord responsible (Article 7:213 BW). When entering into a contract in Tilburg, it is crucial to check standard terms and conditions, especially at popular locations near the Spoorzone. The Huurcommissie or the district court judge in Tilburg can mediate in disputes. Consequences of nullity: the provision is deemed never to have existed, and the contract remains valid otherwise. Tenants must object within a reasonable term, for example via the Juridisch Loket in Tilburg, to avoid tacit acceptance. Tips: consult the General Terms and Conditions for Rental Properties of the Central Government or contact the Woonloket Tilburg for local advice. This way, you avoid costly court proceedings and retain your rights as a tenant in this vibrant city. (248 words)