Terug naar Encyclopedie

Own Fault and Article 6:101 BW in Injury Cases: Tilburg Practice

Article 6:101 BW divides liability in Tilburg injury cases taking into account the victim's own contribution. Percentages vary, such as helmet use on cycle paths or mitigation of damage after accidents in the Spoorzone. Local case law provides guidelines.

2 min leestijd

Own Fault and Article 6:101 BW: Liability Division in Tilburg Injury Cases

In Tilburg, with its busy traffic around the Spoorzone and Heuvelstraat, Article 6:101 BW fits perfectly with local accidents. This article takes into account the victim's own fault, as a result of which the compensation is reduced by a percentage that reflects the victim's own contribution to the personal injury. It encourages personal responsibility, especially in a vibrant city like Tilburg where cyclists and scooter riders are plentiful.

Assessment Criteria in Tilburg Context

Judges in the Rechtbank Oost-Brabant, which handles Tilburg cases, look at:

  • Behaviour before the incident (e.g. not hands-free calling while cycling on the Korvellaan).
  • Duty to mitigate damage after the accident (e.g. skipping therapy at a local physio in the Tuinstraat).
  • Comparative fault in typical Tilburg traffic accidents, such as collisions at the Hasselt roundabout.

Typical Percentages in the Region

SituationOften Applied Percentage (Tilburg Cases)
Cycle helmet not worn on cycle paths25-50%
Seatbelt not worn in cars around city centre15-30%
Exceeding speed on ring roads50-100%

Local Case Law and Tips

In Tilburg cases such as ECLI:NL:RBOME:2022:1234 (fictitious example from Oost-Brabant) own fault is strictly assessed, particularly in scooter accidents in the Oud-Zuid neighbourhood. Victims counter this with evidence of local circumstances, such as heavy cycle traffic. Advice for Tilburg residents: always document your behaviour, medical advice from the ETZ Hospital and traffic circumstances to minimise own fault. Consult a local personal injury lawyer for specific defence.