Terug naar Encyclopedie
Algemeen Bestuursrecht

Proper Motivation of Decisions in Tilburg

Learn about proper motivation of decisions by Municipality of Tilburg. Essential for objections and court in Breda. Help via Juridisch Loket Tilburg. (128 characters)

3 min leestijd

Proper Motivation of Decisions in Tilburg

For residents of Tilburg, proper motivation of a decision is essential in administrative law. When the Municipality of Tilburg takes a decision, such as on a permit or subsidy, the authority must explain why that choice was made. This is based on local facts, interests, and laws to ensure transparency and oversight. Without proper motivation, the District Court of Zeeland-West-Brabant in Breda may declare the decision invalid.

Legal Basis

The duty to motivate is set out in the General Administrative Law Act (Awb), particularly Article 3:46 Awb: "The administrative authority motivates its decisions." It aligns with principles such as Article 3:2 Awb (purposes and interests), Article 3:4 Awb (proportionality), and Article 3:12 Awb (due care). In Tilburg, these rules apply to decisions by the Municipality of Tilburg.

The Council of State and administrative judges have clarified this in cases like ECLI:NL:RVS:2002:AE6389 (addressing all aspects) and ECLI:NL:RVS:2015:AP9367 (specific, not vague). For Tilburg residents, this is crucial in local disputes; consult the duty to motivate for more.

Requirements for Proper Motivation

Motivation is proper if it is complete, accurate, specific, and timely. Key points for Tilburg:

  • Completeness: Include all facts, interests, and rules from the Tilburg context.
  • Accuracy: Correct facts and proper application of laws; errors lead to annulment.
  • Specificity: No vague terms like "public interest"; explain why this decision fits Tilburg specifically.
  • Timeliness: Provided directly with the decision (Article 3:40 Awb).
  • Readability: Clear language understandable to Tilburg residents.

Comparison of good and poor motivation:

Properly motivated (Tilburg)Improperly motivated
"Permit denied: building height of 15 m harms views in the Oud-Zandberg neighborhood, objections from 20 neighbors, and Municipality of Tilburg aesthetics advice dated 12-03-2023.""Refusal for public interest."
"Subsidy for Tilburg cultural project approved: complies with local policies X/Y, €50,000 budget, 500 hours of volunteer work in the Spoorzone.""No subsidy, does not fit."

Practical Examples from Tilburg

The Municipality of Tilburg refuses an environmental permit for an extension: "Exceeds ridge height of 3 m (Article 2.12 Bro), harms streetscape in Heikant, aesthetics report 15-05-2023. Applicant's interest outweighed by local village character (policy rule 4.2 Tilburg)." This shows facts, law, and balancing.

For a subsidy from the Municipality of Tilburg on dyke reinforcement: "Rejected: does not fit priorities in Implementation Program 2023-2027 (priority 2 instead of 1), alternative riverbanks save €200,000." Concrete and verifiable.

Poor example: Parking fine in Tilburg center with only "Violation," without time, location, or evidence. Successful objection possible via Municipality of Tilburg.

Rights and Obligations in Tilburg

Rights of Tilburg residents:

  1. Motivated decision within the deadline (Article 4:13 Awb).
  2. File an objection for improper motivation (Article 6:3 Awb).
  3. Appeal to the District Court of Zeeland-West-Brabant (Breda) if objection fails; review for adequacy (Article 8:12 Awb). Assistance via Juridisch Loket Tilburg.

Obligations of administrative authorities:

  • Motivate in response to objections/appeals.
  • Address public comments (Article 3:41 Awb).
  • Properly motivate any revised decision.

Access to the file via Article 15 Awb; request from Municipality of Tilburg.

Frequently Asked Questions

What if a decision in Tilburg is poorly motivated?

File an objection within six weeks (Article 6:7 Awb). The court annuls for deficiency; a new decision follows. In 2022, 15% of cases failed on this ground. Contact Juridisch Loket Tilburg.

Does motivation always need to be lengthy?

No, short but complete. Depends on complexity; simple Tilburg cases suffice with concise explanation.

Can I challenge solely on lack of motivation?

Yes, standalone ground (Article 6:4 Awb, c). No substantive error required.

When is motivation not timely?

If not included with the decision itself (Article 3:40 Awb). At the Municipality of Tilburg, it must be immediately apparent.