Who bears the burden of proof in Tilburg cases?
In Tilburg courts, such as the District Court of Zeeland-West-Brabant, the primary burden of proof for discounting probabilities rests on the victim (article 150 Rv). However, the judge must investigate relevant facts ex officio (article 6:98 BW), especially in local injury cases following traffic accidents on the Ringbaan or industrial incidents in the Spoorzone. Insurers must substantiate bad chances with expert reports from Tilburg labor experts or physicians from the Elisabeth Tweesteden Hospital.
The judgment of the Supreme Court of 11 May 2018 (ECLI:NL:HR:2018:807) clarified that speculative chances do not count; only plausible scenarios, such as return to work with Tilburg employers in the textile or logistics sector. Procedurally, the Tilburg district court often appoints local experts for labor market research in Midden-Brabant.
Tips for procedural parties in Tilburg
Victims from Tilburg gather incident data from the police station on Tuinstraat, medical records from the ETZ, and career history from the UWV Werkbedrijf Tilburg. Insurers use probabilistic models tailored to the regional labor market, with data from the CBS and local vacancy figures. Objection to expert reports is possible via article 200 Rv. The Court of Appeal 's-Hertogenbosch enforces binding advice, unless manifestly unreasonable, which promotes predictability in Brabant cases.
These rules prevent trial-and-error and ensure efficient handling of injury cases in the Tilburg region, with due regard for local economic dynamics.